Eleanor Cooksey writes:

I had the opportunity to attend a public sector conference last week where my colleague Alex Oliver was giving a talk about our recent research on the Big Society. The focus of the conference was to examine the strategic challenges facing those who manage our public services – people, as we kept being told, who will need to ensure they can deliver more for less – much less – in a time when budget cuts are going to be considerable.

A variety of speakers touched on different aspects to this overall challenge, but one recurrent theme which struck us was the idea that ‘small is beautiful’. Let me explain more what was meant by this – picking up on the three examples:

If some things are getting smaller, it begs the question of what’s getting bigger. There is an obvious answer: ‘Society’.

However, there are some other ‘bigs’ implicit in the ‘smalls’ outlined above, which challenge the notion of ultra-responsive, locally-driven operations. John Collington, Head of Government Procurement at the Cabinet Office, talked about the need to consolidate the existing 16 government procurement frameworks into a smaller number. With possibly less choice at the very top and a plethora at the bottom, one of the challenges will be to ensure all decision-makers, at whatever level, feel confident they understand what their customers want and need, and are able to navigate this range of choices to deliver it effectively – for less.

The photograph at the top of this post was taken by Daniel Greene. It is from the blog Konsthuset.se, and is used with thanks,

2 thoughts on “Is small always beautiful?

  1. Dave Birch says:

    Of course, Ms. Hill could have reduced her salary of £218,000 per annum with gold-plated benefits and used some of the money to run the bus instead.

  2. Three thoughts…
    a) big society and ‘altered nature’ of government/local government – opens up new thinking (away from but incorporating ‘service provision). Maybe parallel to shift from ‘techno-market’ to ‘socio-ecological eras’ (as described by Josephine Green)… new era demands new mindset…
    b) the extent and practice of ‘localism’ as devolutionary/subsidiarity as compared with ‘decentralisation’/re-fashioning provision (even if ‘co-production of ‘services’ is factored in). Maybe ‘place’ has place in the C21st
    c) three or five horizons model may reveal how this might be set over decades not just days, weeks and months… (Big Society Network blogger suggests ‘we’ are travelling in the valley of nobody knows’ (between ‘big state’ and big society’)) … need scouting and way-showing/way-finding for journey…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *