<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking about Millennials and progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thefuturescompany.com/2009/05/07/talking-about-millenials-and-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thefuturescompany.com/2009/05/07/talking-about-millenials-and-pro/</link>
	<description>Bite-size thoughts from HCHLV people about trends, futures and cultural change to provoke and entertain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stubbings</title>
		<link>http://blog.thefuturescompany.com/2009/05/07/talking-about-millenials-and-pro/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stubbings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefuturescompany.com/?p=1027#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, intriguing stuff... I can see how the movement away from physical ownership to &quot;life on demand&quot; will continue, with Millennials at the forefront. But I wonder, with the news that Rupert Murdoch&#039;s News Corp is due to charge for online access for newspapers (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/07/rupert-murdoch-charging-websites) whether this movement will stick with us when it can be paid for in a way that doesn&#039;t just involve advertising. As &quot;life on demand&quot; becomes a more accepted way of doing thisng, will people be more willing to pay for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, intriguing stuff&#8230; I can see how the movement away from physical ownership to &#8220;life on demand&#8221; will continue, with Millennials at the forefront. But I wonder, with the news that Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s News Corp is due to charge for online access for newspapers (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/07/rupert-murdoch-charging-websites" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/07/rupert-murdoch-charging-websites</a>) whether this movement will stick with us when it can be paid for in a way that doesn&#8217;t just involve advertising. As &#8220;life on demand&#8221; becomes a more accepted way of doing thisng, will people be more willing to pay for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
